
 The (optional) abstract syntax of a language
may be specified by a simpler grammar than that for the concrete syntax.
For example,


<Exp> ::=
<Exp> + <Exp>
 <Exp>  <Exp>
 <Exp> * <Exp>
 <Exp> / <Exp>
 <id>
  <Exp>
A grammar for the abstract syntax of simple arithmetic expressions
 Compared to the
concrete syntax,
the abstract syntax is ambiguous and is unsuitable
for direct use in building a parser.
However it is simpler than the concrete syntax and
is very suitable to build
the datastructure for the parsetree returned by a parser, e.g.,

 datatype Exp = binexp of Exp * Bopr * Exp
 unexp of Uopr * Exp
 varid of Ide  ...
in [exp.sml].

 For example, given the input x+y*z either of the
following trees is possible according to the abstract syntax above

 Parse trees for x + y * z
correct bindings
 
incorrect bindings


 but only the left tree is correct according to
the conventional concrete syntax.
 However the right tree would be the correct one given the input
(x+y)*z.
Note that there are no parentheses in the
abstract syntax above nor in the parse trees.
Parentheses are only needed to direct the parser to a certain parse and
are not required in a parse tree which shows the binding of
operators to operands by its very structure.

www #ad:
key 
::= 
"can be replaced by" 
> 
  "or by" 
=>  derivation 
lm 
left most 
rm 
right most 

